What does the Brown v. Mississippi ruling state about confessions?

The Brown v. Mississippi ruling is a landmark case that addressed the legality and admissibility of confessions obtained through coercive means, particularly torture. The decision emphasized that confessions must be voluntary and not the result of physical coercion or abusive treatment. Therefore, any confession obtained through torture or significant physical pressure is deemed inadmissible in court, as it violates the principles of due process and the rights of the individual. This ruling established a fundamental standard in the justice system, ensuring that confessions must be made freely and without compulsion to be considered valid evidence.

The other options do not accurately capture the essence of the ruling. While confessions obtained through persuasion can be admissible, the ruling is centered around the absolute prohibition of confessions derived from torture. Recording confessions is important for transparency and accountability but is not directly addressed in this specific ruling. Lastly, the notion of using coerced confessions contradicts the fundamental principles laid down in the Brown v. Mississippi case, which categorically states that such confessions cannot be admitted as evidence.